zlacker

[return to "OpenAI didn’t copy Scarlett Johansson’s voice for ChatGPT, records show"]
1. zug_zu+AJ1[view] [source] 2024-05-23 13:50:47
>>richar+(OP)
When I first used ChatGPT's voice assistant's I was like "Wow, this one is clearly Scarlett Johansson from Her, they even copy her mannerisms."

No amount of unverifiable "records" (just pieces of paper provided by somebody who has a multimillion dollar incentive to show one outcome) will change my mind.

But if they can produce the actual voice artist I'd be more open-minded.

◧◩
2. dbreun+pM1[view] [source] 2024-05-23 14:04:22
>>zug_zu+AJ1
This shows how bad it is. If you're proactively sharing a package of docs with the Washingington Post, you're toast.

Altman's outreach, his tweet, and the thousands of tweets and comments talking about how similar Sky is to ScarJo is enough to win the case in California.

◧◩◪
3. tptace+a62[view] [source] 2024-05-23 15:41:56
>>dbreun+pM1
The Washington Post comprehensively refuted the story. This is like the "this is good for Bitcoin because ____" meme, but in reverse.
◧◩◪◨
4. FireBe+yA2[view] [source] 2024-05-23 18:16:43
>>tptace+a62
They literally didn't question any of OAI's claims. They just regurgitated them.

They were desperate for a non-union-only actor in their casting. But repeatedly kept hitting up a union actor.

What fears for the actress' safety have been portrayed such that not only does she needs to stay anonymous, but her agent does too?

"Altman was not involved"... yet he personally reached out to SJ to try to close the deal?

[go to top]