zlacker

[return to "Leaked OpenAI documents reveal aggressive tactics toward former employees"]
1. tedivm+W2[view] [source] 2024-05-22 22:38:55
>>apengw+(OP)
If this really was a mistake the easiest way to deal with it would be to release people from their non disparagement agreements that were only signed by leaving employees under the duress of losing their vested equity.

It's really easy to make people whole for this, so whether that happens or not is the difference between the apologies being real or just them just backpedaling because employees got upset.

Edit: Looks like they're doing the right thing here:

> Altman’s initial statement was criticized for doing too little to make things right for former employees, but in an emailed statement, OpenAI told me that “we are identifying and reaching out to former employees who signed a standard exit agreement to make it clear that OpenAI has not and will not cancel their vested equity and releases them from nondisparagement obligations” — which goes much further toward fixing their mistake.

◧◩
2. polack+f4[view] [source] 2024-05-22 22:46:14
>>tedivm+W2
> ”we are identifying and reaching out to former employees who signed a standard exit agreement to make it clear that OpenAI has not and will not cancel their vested equity and releases them from nondisparagement obligations”

Looks like they’re doing that.

◧◩◪
3. dragon+f5[view] [source] 2024-05-22 22:52:14
>>polack+f4
Well, they say they are. But the nondisparagement agreement repeatedly forbids revealing the agreement itself, so if it wasn't cancelled those subject to it would be forbidden to point out that the public claim they were going to release people from it was a lie (or done only for people from whom OpenAI was not particularly concerned about potential disparagement.)
◧◩◪◨
4. brooks+Ka[view] [source] 2024-05-22 23:21:16
>>dragon+f5
“I have not been released from any exit agreement” is not disparagement.
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. dragon+ec[view] [source] 2024-05-22 23:29:14
>>brooks+Ka
“disparagement" is whatever is defined in the agreement, which reportedly (from one of the people who declined to sign it) includes discussing the existence of the agreement.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. negles+Nd[view] [source] 2024-05-22 23:37:14
>>dragon+ec
Dear heavens, being a corporate employee is paranoia and depression-inducing. It's literally like walking into a legal minefield.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. Symmet+aY1[view] [source] 2024-05-23 14:13:13
>>negles+Nd
This is not normal for being a corporate employee. This was certainly going to come out eventually and cause big problems, but to the extent Sam thinks AGI is around the corner he might not be playing the long game.
[go to top]