zlacker

>>richar+(OP)
I can't help but think that this was all planned. It is a very intricately planned, and geniously executed marketing ploy to make sure everyone knows about the company, the new release, that there is voice now, and even makes everyone look into it just to "see for themselves". Whether this was in with ScarJo in the loop or not, does not really change the outcome, but would be a nice information we probably will never get, in order to understand how cut-throat whoever came up with this idea actually is.

I am impressed

>>joekin+rN
Regardless of legal outcome, there now exists a corpus of public text from news coverage of this incident, upon which OpenAI will be trained, which correlates SJ's name to reporting on a 2024 OpenAI voice.

>>walter+IS
And what does this imply?

>>grugag+rb1
Imagine what GPT-5 might say in the future, once it's been trained on a snapshot of the Internet including these articles:

> whose voice do you use?

> It's based on Scarlett Johannson's performance in "Her."