zlacker

[return to "OpenAI didn’t copy Scarlett Johansson’s voice for ChatGPT, records show"]
1. xyst+OP[view] [source] 2024-05-23 06:41:46
>>richar+(OP)
I don’t think OpenAI has a chance to win this in open court.

They are very likely to settle out of court. Investors get a bit anxious with pending litigation.

But I honestly hope Johansson does not. She certainly has the runway to take it all the way. Make them look like fools in open court. Show the people their real colors.

◧◩
2. SeanAn+FQ[view] [source] 2024-05-23 06:49:21
>>xyst+OP
Why do you feel OpenAI doesn't have a chance to win in court given the information presented in this WaPo article? It seems fairly conclusive to me.
◧◩◪
3. boxed+CT[view] [source] 2024-05-23 07:12:53
>>SeanAn+FQ
Copying by hiring a sound-alike/impersonator is an implementation detail. They knew full well that they were trying to copy her voice. Then they asked. And they got a no. And then they did it anyway.

I don't see how the implementation details matter at all.

◧◩◪◨
4. pests+GV[view] [source] 2024-05-23 07:30:39
>>boxed+CT
It's their natural voice.

Are they not allowed to hire a person that sounds like... any famous person?

Aren't others in this thread claiming how similar voices can be and theyre not unqiue?

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. bux93+A91[view] [source] 2024-05-23 09:29:10
>>pests+GV
The VA has not been identified, but I bet that she has a showreel in which you can hear at least ten different natural voices that are not at all like SJ's performance in 'her'. A sad read for the local undertaker. A maniacal shouty ad for the monster truck rally. A motherly read for baby formula. Some fun accents. A dramatic read.
[go to top]