zlacker

[return to "OpenAI pulls Johansson soundalike Sky’s voice from ChatGPT"]
1. projec+DZ1[view] [source] 2024-05-20 23:30:20
>>helsin+(OP)
It is incredibly disheartening to see what was born a non-profit dedicated to guiding AI towards beneficial (or at the very least neutral) ends, to predictably fall into the well-worn SV groove of progressively shittier behavior in the pursuit of additional billions. What is victory for Open AI even supposed to look like by now?
◧◩
2. ecjhdn+G62[view] [source] 2024-05-21 00:13:26
>>projec+DZ1
I may be incredibly shallow but personally I am experiencing feelings of joy and validation.

Every time I tried to suggest that maybe, LLMs and GAN tools don't make creativity easier but lazier and emptier or that this technology area is parasitic off human culture, every time an OpenAI junkie told me, "hey, perhaps humans aren't much different from LLMs", or someone said artists are derivative too and don't really deserve any more protections or are "gatekeeping art"...

... my anger at the time is vindicated every time these greedy, cynical wretches that the US tech industry has raced to anoint are taken down a peg because of their own very obvious greed and expedience.

I am loving this.

I may also be shallow in feeling a measure of glee that Microsoft is racing forward to shoehorn this utter toxicity into every corner of their product range, just in time for their customers to fully understand how it reeks of contempt for them.

◧◩◪
3. rowanG+cd6[view] [source] 2024-05-22 07:05:24
>>ecjhdn+G62
I can't understand this. It seems like don quixote trying to defeat windmills.
◧◩◪◨
4. ecjhdn+sB6[view] [source] 2024-05-22 11:20:08
>>rowanG+cd6
Why? Why is it inevitable that the AI world must do LLMs, must steal all of culture without recompense, and must deride human ability in order to defend the limitations of the replacement technology?

Answer is: it’s not. To all three. And collectively we can decide to be better. This is why artists are pushing back. One day perhaps the tech world will understand that they aren’t Luddites but instead champions for humanity.

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. rowanG+F17[view] [source] 2024-05-22 14:11:05
>>ecjhdn+sB6
Because progress in AI depends on a great dataset. A dataset that does not exist in the public domain. And the progress in AI is worth too much to stop because laws are not enacted yet. My quality of work has improved significantly since having access to chatGPT4. And this has improved by leaps again since chatGPT4o.
[go to top]