zlacker

>>panark+(OP)
I love how we went from questioning copyright & licensing to "GPT vs Google, which one is better". To every artist or engineer out there who contributed to the general knowledge: you lost, everything you've ever done to help other people is now part of the models and there's nothing you can do to take it back. What even happened to the copyright strikes artists were supposed to bring up against these AI companies? That seems like 100 years ago :)

>>s1k3s+O2
I'm happy to contribute to the general knowledge. It's better than being forgotten and having no impact.

>>Walter+u3
Oh you will be forgotten. All your knowledge will come from some trademarked AI bot and you won't even get a linkback

>>malfis+D4
> Oh you will be forgotten.

Not your parent comenter but please allow me to enlighten you.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walter_Bright

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/D_(programming_language)

When in doubt, always double-check who you're replying to in HN. We are lucky to have many great minds around.

>>hu3+U6
The point is still salient. People who don’t have Wikipedia links will be forgotten. Though I guess maybe that’s always been true.

>>dclowd+Ec
Your legacy can continue as part of the AI trained on your output.

What would you prefer? Would you want people to remember your name? Your face? Your voice? Which people? How often should they have to remember you? For how many thousands of years?