zlacker

>>panark+(OP)
I don't like @sama just as much as the next person, but come on, in what world is ScarJo's voice unique? There are many people who sound like her. Does she imply that she "owns" this voice so no one else can use it? Excuse me, that's not how it works.

Edit: IMO OpenAI should just make their voice engine open source. Then we'll see if ScarJo or anyone else can stop the open-source community. I expected more from her.

>>behnam+n1
It's all fun and games until someone gets a hold of your voice and uses it to scam a few grand out of your elderly family members. Disregarding ideas about ownership of celebrity image, it's not good to have that sort of technology out in the wild,

The fact that he pulled it down has me believing that he knew there was a real chance the company would get in trouble if he hadn't.

>>lenerd+j3
> it's not good to have that sort of technology out in the wild

Cat's already out of the bag: https://www.newyorker.com/science/annals-of-artificial-intel...

>>okdood+26
Oh, I know.

I'm responding more to the idea of "legitimate" businesses just cloning people's voice to associate their identity with a product by comparing it to something slimeballs do to the elderly, including my late grandmother.