zlacker

[return to "Statement from Scarlett Johansson on the OpenAI "Sky" voice"]
1. anon37+t5[view] [source] 2024-05-20 22:58:41
>>mjcl+(OP)
Well, that statement lays out a damning timeline:

- OpenAI approached Scarlett last fall, and she refused.

- Two days before the GPT-4o launch, they contacted her agent and asked that she reconsider. (Two days! This means they already had everything they needed to ship the product with Scarlett’s cloned voice.)

- Not receiving a response, OpenAI demos the product anyway, with Sam tweeting “her” in reference to Scarlett’s film.

- When Scarlett’s counsel asked for an explanation of how the “Sky” voice was created, OpenAI yanked the voice from their product line.

Perhaps Sam’s next tweet should read “red-handed”.

◧◩
2. toss1+4z[view] [source] 2024-05-21 02:26:58
>>anon37+t5
ChatGPT is way better than to need stupid ripoffs than this

Sam should be ashamed to have ever thought of ripping off anyone's voice, let alone done it and rolled it out.

They are building some potentially world-changing technology, but cannot rise above being basically creepy rip-off artists. Einstein was right about requiring improved ethics to meet new challenges, and also that we are not meeting that requirement.

sad to see

◧◩◪
3. latexr+ZG1[view] [source] 2024-05-21 12:46:59
>>toss1+4z
> ChatGPT is way better than to need stupid ripoffs than this

Of course it’s not. All of ChatGPT is a ripoff. That’s what training data (which they did not license) is.

[go to top]