zlacker

[return to "Statement from Scarlett Johansson on the OpenAI "Sky" voice"]
1. anon37+t5[view] [source] 2024-05-20 22:58:41
>>mjcl+(OP)
Well, that statement lays out a damning timeline:

- OpenAI approached Scarlett last fall, and she refused.

- Two days before the GPT-4o launch, they contacted her agent and asked that she reconsider. (Two days! This means they already had everything they needed to ship the product with Scarlett’s cloned voice.)

- Not receiving a response, OpenAI demos the product anyway, with Sam tweeting “her” in reference to Scarlett’s film.

- When Scarlett’s counsel asked for an explanation of how the “Sky” voice was created, OpenAI yanked the voice from their product line.

Perhaps Sam’s next tweet should read “red-handed”.

◧◩
2. nickth+R7[view] [source] 2024-05-20 23:10:38
>>anon37+t5
This statement from scarlet really changed my perspective. I use and loved the Sky voice and I did feel it sounded a little like her, but moreover it was the best of their voice offerings. I was mad when they removed it. But now I’m mad it was ever there to begin with. This timeline makes it clear that this wasn’t a coincidence and maybe not even a hiring of an impressionist (which is where things get a little more wishy washy for me).
◧◩◪
3. windex+qA[view] [source] 2024-05-21 02:43:47
>>nickth+R7
The thing about the situation is that Altman is willing to lie and steal a celebrity's voice for use in ChatGPT. What he did, the timeline, everything - is sleazy if, in fact, that's the story.

The really concerning part here is that Altman is, and wants to be, a large part of AI regulation [0]. Quite the public contradiction.

[0] https://www.businessinsider.com/sam-altman-openai-artificial...

◧◩◪◨
4. beefnu+hR[view] [source] 2024-05-21 05:32:36
>>windex+qA
the whole technology is based on fucking over artists, who didn't expect this exact thing?
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. surfin+PW[view] [source] 2024-05-21 06:34:25
>>beefnu+hR
It's not just the artists, anything you do in the digital realm and anything that can be digitised is fair game. In the UK NHS GP practices refuse to register you to see a doctor even when it's urgent and tell you to use a third-party app to book an appointment. You have use your phone to take photos of the affected area and provide a personal info. I fully expect that data to be fed into some AI and sold without me knowing and without a process for removal of data should the company go bust. It is preying on the vulnerable when they need help.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. Kineti+fZ[view] [source] 2024-05-21 06:58:32
>>surfin+PW
Last time I booked a blood test it was via the official NHS app , not a third party.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. surfin+d01[view] [source] 2024-05-21 07:06:35
>>Kineti+fZ
https://www.patientaccess.com/
[go to top]