zlacker

>>helsin+(OP)
> We’ve heard questions about how we chose the voices in ChatGPT, especially Sky. We are working to pause the use of Sky while we address them.

Why?

They take it for granted that there is obviously something wrong here. Are users actually concerned about this? I think most people would not care. Is this just manufactured for the exposure? Is this just another example of OpenAI's condescending moral superiority complex?

>>dbsmit+Pk
Are you missing the possibility that Scarlett might care?

>>browni+mm
She should be happy she was selected as the voice of such a revolutionary piece of technology. It's a honor for her voice to be selected, she should show some humility and better social awareness in these matters.

>>iamlep+HF
I can’t tell if you’re being sarcastic or not. Do you say the same thing when she’s “selected” for deep fake porn videos?

>>nozzle+dJ1
So, a completely different actor voluntarily performs voice acting (a job) in exchange for money, using her natural voice (not mimicking Scarlett) and because there are some similarities, this situation is comparable to... Deep fake porn? What the..?

>>baobab+wd2
Sorry, did you deliberately skip over a bunch of comments to read mine or something? It feels like you missed some context. The person I was replying to was saying that ScarJo should be happy and grateful that the OpenAI voice was chosen to sound like hers, and that she should feel honored. With that context in mind, my question was whether she should also feel honored when she’s chosen as the subject for somebody’s Deep Fake porn — something she similarly has no control over and is only selected for due to her appearance/voice. I brought up Deep Fake porn specifically because it’s something she has been a victim of in the past.