zlacker

>>helsin+(OP)
> We’ve heard questions about how we chose the voices in ChatGPT, especially Sky. We are working to pause the use of Sky while we address them.

Why?

They take it for granted that there is obviously something wrong here. Are users actually concerned about this? I think most people would not care. Is this just manufactured for the exposure? Is this just another example of OpenAI's condescending moral superiority complex?

>>dbsmit+Pk
Are you missing the possibility that Scarlett might care?

>>browni+mm
Possibly, but that is not what their statement suggests to me, unless those 'questions' came from her/her legal team. I suppose they could also be worried about future legal action from her. Maybe it just isn't worth getting sued, even if you technically did nothing wrong. But I also have a hard time believing they went thru this careful process of voice selection and it never occurred to them that the voice sounded like her, and didn't think about the legal repercussions

https://openai.com/index/how-the-voices-for-chatgpt-were-cho...

>>dbsmit+Ao
How about this statement from Scarlett Johansson herself?

https://daringfireball.net/linked/2024/05/20/openai-johansso...