zlacker

[return to "Statement from Scarlett Johansson on the OpenAI "Sky" voice"]
◧
1. aaronh+L1[view] [source] 2024-05-20 22:38:40
>>mjcl+(OP)
Well, this confirms that OpenAI have been shooting from the hip, not that we needed much confirmation. The fact that they repeatedly tried to hire Johansson, then went ahead and made a soundalike while explicitly describing that they were trying to make it be like her voice in the movie … is pretty bad for them.
◧◩
2. signal+z8[view] [source] 2024-05-20 23:13:32
>>aaronh+L1
OpenAI claimed they hired a different professional actor who performed using her own voice [1].

If so, I suspect they’ll be okay in a court of law — having a voice similar to a celebrity isn’t illegal.

It’ll likely cheese off actors and performers though.

[1] https://www.forbes.com/sites/roberthart/2024/05/20/openai-sa...

◧◩◪
3. hn_205+V9[view] [source] 2024-05-20 23:22:05
>>signal+z8
Seems like sama may have put a big hole in that argument when he tweeted "her", now it is very easy to say that they knowingly cloned ScarJo's likeness. When will tech leaders learn to stop tweeting.
◧◩◪◨
4. chipwe+ng[view] [source] 2024-05-21 00:01:45
>>hn_205+V9
Or perhaps they cloned a character's likeness?

Is there a distinction?

Are they trying to make it sound like Her, or SJ? Or just trying to go for a similar style? i.e. making artistic choices in designing their product

Note: I've never watched the movie.

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. romwel+4j[view] [source] 2024-05-21 00:19:48
>>chipwe+ng
>Is there a distinction?

Yes, that would be a copyright violation on top of everything else.

Great idea though!

I'm going to start selling Keanu Reeves T-Shirts using this little trick.

See, I'm not using Keanu's likeness if I don't label it as Keanu. I'm just going to write Neo in a Tweet, and then say I'm just cloning Neo's likeness.

Neo is not a real person, so Keanu can't sue me! Bwahahaha

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. whokno+6o[view] [source] 2024-05-21 00:50:26
>>romwel+4j
I love these takes that constantly pop up in tech circles.

There's no way "you" (the people that engage in these tactics) believe anyone is that gullible to not see what's happening. You either believe yourselves to be exceedingly clever or everyone else has the intelligence of toddler.

With the gumption some tech "leaders" display, maybe both.

If you have to say "technically it's not" 5x in a row to justify a position in a social context just short-circuit your brain and go do something else.

[go to top]