zlacker

[return to "OpenAI departures: Why can’t former employees talk?"]
1. modele+TH[view] [source] 2024-05-18 01:37:36
>>fnbr+(OP)
A lot of the brouhaha about OpenAI is silly, I think. But this is gross. Forcing employees to sign a perpetual non-disparagement agreement under threat of clawing back the large majority of their already earned compensation should not be legal. Honestly it probably isn't, but it'll take someone brave enough to sue to find out.
◧◩
2. twobit+SN[view] [source] 2024-05-18 03:09:48
>>modele+TH
If I have equity in a company and I care about its value, I’m not going to say anything to tank its value. If I sell my equity later on, and then disparage the company, what can OpenAI hope to do to me?
◧◩◪
3. modele+9O[view] [source] 2024-05-18 03:17:27
>>twobit+SN
They can sue you into bankruptcy, obviously.

Also, what if you can't sell? Selling is at their discretion. They can prevent you from selling some of your so-called "equity" to keep you on their leash as long as they want.

◧◩◪◨
4. twobit+QB1[view] [source] 2024-05-18 14:22:33
>>modele+9O
That’s a good point, if you can get the equity liquid - I don’t think the lawsuit would go far or end up in bankruptcy. In this case, the truth of what happened at OpenAI would be revealed even more in a trial, which is not something they’d like and this type of contract with lifetime provisions isn’t likely to be enforced by a court IMO - especially when the information revealed is in the public’s interest and truthful.
[go to top]