zlacker

>>jnnnth+(OP)
It is excellent that he is speaking out.

I don't believe we can create something more intelligent than us. Smarter, yes, but not more intelligent. We will always have a deeper and more nuanced understanding of reality than our artificial counterparts. But it does not mean that AI can not be a danger.

>>nen-no+cn
> We will always have a deeper and more nuanced understanding of reality than our artificial counterparts.

Wishful thinking already disproven by collectives (Google and OpenAI) that are already better at understanding and acting upon reality than you or any single human intelligence. These are systems, and they can soon hollow out their biological components.

>>reduce+VB
Do you not consider such collectives part of we (the humans)? I can understand arguing that organizations have some superinteligence. But they are still made of / run on humans - not AI/computers?

>>jonono+2D1
They’re currently made up of humans, but more and more will be made of computers. In their human forms, they’re still a subversion of human values, doing things as a whole, because of incentives, that the individual humans wouldn’t do. But in the future, entire corporations will get whittled down to machine processes. An AGI decision maker at the top and each individual task replaced with robot or software agent.