zlacker

[return to "OpenAI departures: Why can’t former employees talk?"]
1. jay-ba+DF[view] [source] 2024-05-18 01:06:22
>>fnbr+(OP)
It probably would be better to switch the link from the X post to the Vox article [0].

From the article:

“““

It turns out there’s a very clear reason for [why no one who had once worked at OpenAI was talking]. I have seen the extremely restrictive off-boarding agreement that contains nondisclosure and non-disparagement provisions former OpenAI employees are subject to. It forbids them, for the rest of their lives, from criticizing their former employer. Even acknowledging that the NDA exists is a violation of it.

If a departing employee declines to sign the document, or if they violate it, they can lose all vested equity they earned during their time at the company, which is likely worth millions of dollars. One former employee, Daniel Kokotajlo, who posted that he quit OpenAI “due to losing confidence that it would behave responsibly around the time of AGI,” has confirmed publicly that he had to surrender what would have likely turned out to be a huge sum of money in order to quit without signing the document.

”””

[0]: https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/2024/5/17/24158478/openai...

◧◩
2. jakder+hc1[view] [source] 2024-05-18 10:04:43
>>jay-ba+DF
>>contains nondisclosure and non-disparagement provisions former OpenAI employees are subject to. It forbids them, for the rest of their lives, from criticizing their former employer. Even acknowledging that the NDA exists is a violation of it.

Perfect! So it's so incredibly overreaching that any judge in California would deem the entire NDA unenforceable..

Either that or, in your effort to overstate a point, you exaggerated in a way that undermines the point you were trying to make.

[go to top]