zlacker

>>fnbr+(OP)
Is this a legally enforceable suppression of free speech? If so, are there ways to be open about OpenAI, without triggering punitive action?

>>a_wild+jt
I believe a better solution to this would be to spread the following sentiment: "Since it's already illegal to tell disparaging lies, the mere existence of such a clause implies some disparaging truths to which the party is aware." Always assuming the worst around hidden information provides a strong incentive to be transparent.

>>Yurgen+nv
I hope forbidding telling the truth is about something banal like "fake it until you make it" in some of OpenAI demos. The technology looks like magic but plausible to implement in a few months/years.

Worse if it is related to training future super intelligence to kill people. Killer drones are possible even with today's technology without AGI.