zlacker

>>fnbr+(OP)
Is this a legally enforceable suppression of free speech? If so, are there ways to be open about OpenAI, without triggering punitive action?

>>a_wild+jt
I believe a better solution to this would be to spread the following sentiment: "Since it's already illegal to tell disparaging lies, the mere existence of such a clause implies some disparaging truths to which the party is aware." Always assuming the worst around hidden information provides a strong incentive to be transparent.

>>Yurgen+nv
That’s a really good point. A variation of the Streisand Effect.

Makes you wonder what misdeeds they’re trying so hard to hide.