zlacker

[return to "Ilya Sutskever to leave OpenAI"]
1. zoogen+Ix[view] [source] 2024-05-15 04:50:43
>>wavela+(OP)
Interesting, both Karpathy and Sutskever are gone from OpenAI now. Looks like it is now the Sam Altman and Greg Brockman show.

I have to admit, of the four, Karpathy and Sutskever were the two I was most impressed with. I hope he goes on to do something great.

◧◩
2. nabla9+pH[view] [source] 2024-05-15 06:45:38
>>zoogen+Ix
Top 6 science guys are long gone. Open AI is run by marketing, business, software and productization people.

When the next wave of new deep learning innovations sweeps the world, Microsoft eats whats left of them. They make lots of money, but don't have future unless they replace what they lost.

◧◩◪
3. fnordp+SH[view] [source] 2024-05-15 06:52:31
>>nabla9+pH
I don’t feel that OpenAI has a huge moat against say Anthropic. And I don’t know OpenAI needs Microsoft nearly as much as Microsoft needs OpenAI
◧◩◪◨
4. cm2187+bN[view] [source] 2024-05-15 07:49:53
>>fnordp+SH
But is it even clear what is the next big leap after LLM? I have the feeling many tend to extrapolate the progress of AI from the last 2 years to the next 30 years but research doesn't always work like that (though improvements in computing power did).
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. huygen+JX[view] [source] 2024-05-15 09:38:45
>>cm2187+bN
Not saying it’s going to be the same, but I’m sure computing progress looked pretty unimpressive from, say, 1975 to 1990 for the uninitiated.

By the 90s they were still mainly used as fancy typewriters by “normal” people (my parents, school, etc) although the ridiculous potential was clear from day one.

It just took a looong time to go from pong to ping and then to living online. I’m still convinced even this stage is temporary and only a milestone on the way to bigger and better things. Computing and computational thought still has to percolate into all corners of society.

Again not saying “LLM’s” are the same, but AI in general will probably walk a similar path. It just takes a long time, think decades, not years.

Edit: wanted to mention The Mother of All Demos by Engelbart (1968), which to me looks like it captures all essential aspects of what distributed online computing can do. In a “low resolution”, of course.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. dmd+wf1[view] [source] 2024-05-15 12:19:03
>>huygen+JX
It was only 11 years from pong to ping.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. huygen+OE3[view] [source] 2024-05-16 04:26:11
>>dmd+wf1
You and your family and friends were online in 1983? That’s quite remarkable.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯
8. dmd+l84[view] [source] 2024-05-16 11:06:18
>>huygen+OE3
No, but that’s when “ping” was written, which is what you said.

(And, irrelevant, but my parents were in fact both posting to Usenet in 1983.)

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯▣
9. huygen+Hg4[view] [source] 2024-05-16 12:33:32
>>dmd+l84
Kind of missing the forest for the trees, but TIL the actual application called ping was written in 1983.
[go to top]