zlacker

>>Jimmc4+(OP)
It is easy to point to loopy theories around superalignment, p(doom), etc. But you don't have to be hopped up on sci-fi to oppose something like GPT-4o. Low-latency response time is fine. The faking of emotions and overt references to Her (along with the suspiciously-timed relaxation of pornographic generations) are not fine. I suspect Altman/Brockman/Murati intended for this thing to be dangerous for mentally unwell users, using the exact same logic as tobacco companies.

>>nickle+491
I don't understand what you're referring to with that tobacco reference.

>>simonw+xd1
Not the parent comment, but I think he means something like "we know folks will be addicted to this pseudo-person and that is a good thing cause it makes our product valuable", akin to reports that tobacco companies knew the harms and addictive nature of their products and kept steadfast nonetheless. (But I'm speculating as to the parent's actual intent)

>>Chicag+7e1
I miss Sydney :’

>>rvnx+sg1
I'm confused. Context?

>>all2+Dk1
Sydney was an early version of Bing GPT that was more than a little nuts.

>>scroll+Pl1
Oh, the one they let loose on Twitter? The one that almost immediately became an alt right troll?