zlacker

>>Jimmc4+(OP)
It is easy to point to loopy theories around superalignment, p(doom), etc. But you don't have to be hopped up on sci-fi to oppose something like GPT-4o. Low-latency response time is fine. The faking of emotions and overt references to Her (along with the suspiciously-timed relaxation of pornographic generations) are not fine. I suspect Altman/Brockman/Murati intended for this thing to be dangerous for mentally unwell users, using the exact same logic as tobacco companies.

>>nickle+491
Not fine... to you.

What's your stance on other activities which can lead to harmful actions from people with predilections towards addiction such as:

1. Loot boxes / Fremium games

2. Legalized gambling

3. Pornography

etc. etc.

I don't really have a horse in the race, neither for/against, but I prefer consistency in belief systems.