zlacker

>>Jimmc4+(OP)
It is easy to point to loopy theories around superalignment, p(doom), etc. But you don't have to be hopped up on sci-fi to oppose something like GPT-4o. Low-latency response time is fine. The faking of emotions and overt references to Her (along with the suspiciously-timed relaxation of pornographic generations) are not fine. I suspect Altman/Brockman/Murati intended for this thing to be dangerous for mentally unwell users, using the exact same logic as tobacco companies.

>>nickle+491
> The faking of emotions and overt references to Her (along with the suspiciously-timed relaxation of pornographic generations) are not fine.

Are you not aware of how many billions are getting spent on fake girlfriends on Only Fans, with millions of people chatting away with low paid labor across an ocean pretending to be an american girl? This is just reducing costs, but the consumers are already wanting the product.

I'm not sure I get the outrage / puritanism. Adults being able to chat to a fake girlfriend if they want to seems super bland. There's way more stuff out there that's way wilder you can do online, potentially also exploiting the real person on the other side of the screen if they are trafficked or whatever. I don't have any mental issues (well, who knows? ha) and genuinely would try it the same way you try a new porn category every once in a while.

>>vasco+Kt1
The 2nd most visited GenAI website is character ai.

The net sum of all LLM B2C usecases (effectively Chatgpt) is competing with AI girlfriends for rank 1.

It isn't just huge. It is the most profitable usecase for gen AI.

"A goal of a system is what it does"

>>screye+HT1
I mean I didn't want to say it in my original reply but your comment makes it even more difficult to resist:

"The internet is for porn" https://youtu.be/LTJvdGcb7Fs?si=8H1OzeyG5XzU-Qe8