zlacker

>>Jimmc4+(OP)
It is easy to point to loopy theories around superalignment, p(doom), etc. But you don't have to be hopped up on sci-fi to oppose something like GPT-4o. Low-latency response time is fine. The faking of emotions and overt references to Her (along with the suspiciously-timed relaxation of pornographic generations) are not fine. I suspect Altman/Brockman/Murati intended for this thing to be dangerous for mentally unwell users, using the exact same logic as tobacco companies.

>>nickle+491
> The faking of emotions and overt references to Her (along with the suspiciously-timed relaxation of pornographic generations) are not fine.

Are you not aware of how many billions are getting spent on fake girlfriends on Only Fans, with millions of people chatting away with low paid labor across an ocean pretending to be an american girl? This is just reducing costs, but the consumers are already wanting the product.

I'm not sure I get the outrage / puritanism. Adults being able to chat to a fake girlfriend if they want to seems super bland. There's way more stuff out there that's way wilder you can do online, potentially also exploiting the real person on the other side of the screen if they are trafficked or whatever. I don't have any mental issues (well, who knows? ha) and genuinely would try it the same way you try a new porn category every once in a while.

>>vasco+Kt1
There's a lot of harmful stuff already in the world, but most of us would rather not add to the pile on an industrial scale.

>>Retr0i+XA1
I for one think consenting adults should be able to do mildly harmful things like waste their time/money on a fake girlfriend if they so choose, and find it offensive that others would try to impose their values on others by restricting them from doing so

>>jobs_t+GF1
Nobody's restricting anything, we're discussing someone choosing not to work for a particular company.