zlacker

[return to "Jan Leike Resigns from OpenAI"]
1. nickle+491[view] [source] 2024-05-15 14:48:28
>>Jimmc4+(OP)
It is easy to point to loopy theories around superalignment, p(doom), etc. But you don't have to be hopped up on sci-fi to oppose something like GPT-4o. Low-latency response time is fine. The faking of emotions and overt references to Her (along with the suspiciously-timed relaxation of pornographic generations) are not fine. I suspect Altman/Brockman/Murati intended for this thing to be dangerous for mentally unwell users, using the exact same logic as tobacco companies.
◧◩
2. llm_tr+Fg1[view] [source] 2024-05-15 15:22:29
>>nickle+491
>dangerous for mentally unwell users

It's not our job to make the world safe for fundamentally unsafe people.

◧◩◪
3. limpbi+bi1[view] [source] 2024-05-15 15:29:45
>>llm_tr+Fg1
Okay this is a weird philosophy to have lol
◧◩◪◨
4. anthon+Ki1[view] [source] 2024-05-15 15:31:54
>>limpbi+bi1
no it isnt, its how everything in society currently operates. We put dangerous people in jail away from everyone else
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. itisha+5j1[view] [source] 2024-05-15 15:34:14
>>anthon+Ki1
The crime of the "dangerous people" in OP's statement was loneliness and suggestibility.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. baobab+Wj1[view] [source] 2024-05-15 15:37:58
>>itisha+5j1
And it's not OpenAI's job to safetify the world for gullible loners.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. itisha+3l1[view] [source] 2024-05-15 15:43:10
>>baobab+Wj1
Who else can? OpenAI makes the tool.

Are you suggesting we need government intervention or just saying "damn the consequences"?

[go to top]