zlacker

>>Jimmc4+(OP)
It is easy to point to loopy theories around superalignment, p(doom), etc. But you don't have to be hopped up on sci-fi to oppose something like GPT-4o. Low-latency response time is fine. The faking of emotions and overt references to Her (along with the suspiciously-timed relaxation of pornographic generations) are not fine. I suspect Altman/Brockman/Murati intended for this thing to be dangerous for mentally unwell users, using the exact same logic as tobacco companies.

>>nickle+491
>I suspect Altman/Brockman/Murati intended for this thing to be dangerous for mentally unwell users

Isn't it much more likely that they are just trying to make a product that people want to use?

Even Tobacco companies don't go out of their way to give people cancer.

>>sebzim+Sj1
But tobacco companies are still complicit in distributing addictive carcinogens to people even if only in trace amounts. The same could be said about predatory business models/products.