zlacker

>>Jimmc4+(OP)
It is easy to point to loopy theories around superalignment, p(doom), etc. But you don't have to be hopped up on sci-fi to oppose something like GPT-4o. Low-latency response time is fine. The faking of emotions and overt references to Her (along with the suspiciously-timed relaxation of pornographic generations) are not fine. I suspect Altman/Brockman/Murati intended for this thing to be dangerous for mentally unwell users, using the exact same logic as tobacco companies.

>>nickle+491
I don't understand what you're referring to with that tobacco reference.

>>simonw+xd1
I read it as the economics of tobacco (and alcohol and a few other 'vice' industries) that there will invariably be superusers who get addicted and produce the most economic value for companies even while consuming an actively harmful product