zlacker

>>Jimmc4+(OP)
It is easy to point to loopy theories around superalignment, p(doom), etc. But you don't have to be hopped up on sci-fi to oppose something like GPT-4o. Low-latency response time is fine. The faking of emotions and overt references to Her (along with the suspiciously-timed relaxation of pornographic generations) are not fine. I suspect Altman/Brockman/Murati intended for this thing to be dangerous for mentally unwell users, using the exact same logic as tobacco companies.

>>nickle+491
I'll just point to the theory that they didn't want to work for a megacorp creating tools for other megacorps (or worse) and actually believed in OpenAI's (initial) mission to further humanity. The tools are going to be used by deep pocketed entities for their purposes, the compute resources necessary require that to be the case for the foreseeable future.