zlacker

>>wavela+(OP)
Ilya knows how ChatGPT works. Any company that hires him will be able to catch up with ChatGPT.

>>breadw+D4
I think what is probably very stressful about this space is virtually everyone knows how ChatGPT works. It is not a theoretical leap. It's actually fairly predictable how this shakes out, and OpenAI is pretty vulnerable.

an LLM is a curiosity without user data, anyone with a big silo of data can put out something years behind frontier and still instantly see huge usage. No one wants to go to AI, they want AI to come to them, unless OpenAI can stake a claim in a super novel way they're the Dropbox.

It's not like someone is going to use insider OpenAI knowledge to build an LLM so advanced you switch email, phone, or ERP providers

>>menaci+Us
Last time such a departure led to the creation of Anthropic (Dario Amodei), they even equalled GPT-4's performance

>>visarg+2v
I think it's less that only 4 wizards on earth can create it, and more that hardly anyone wants to.

If Apple, Google, or MS are integrating LLMs, they can't get away with "you can talk to this website". The intersection of "has the cash to train a LLM" and "LLM is itself the entire offering" is very small