zlacker

[return to "Cubic millimetre of brain mapped at nanoscale resolution"]
1. blinco+Kd[view] [source] 2024-05-09 23:39:32
>>geox+(OP)
Why did the researchers use ML models to do the reconstruction and risk getting completely incorrect, hallucinated results when reconstructing a 3D volume accurately using 2D slices is a well-researched field already?
◧◩
2. Viking+Qe[view] [source] 2024-05-09 23:49:37
>>blinco+Kd
I'm guessing a registration problem.

If all of the layers were guaranteed to be orthographic with no twisting, shearing, scaling, squishing, with a consistent origin... Then yeah, there's a huge number of ways to just render that data.

But if you physically slice layers first, and scan them second, there are all manner of physical processes that can make normal image stacking fail miserably.

[go to top]