zlacker

[return to "A leadership crisis in the Nix community"]
1. jsyang+d9[view] [source] 2024-04-29 15:39:36
>>elikog+(OP)
The Anduril issue seems to have been the main catalyst for the drama. Seems like Anduril probably did more harm then good - who at Anduril couldn't have predicted that the Nix folks would start to have a major freakout the minute they attempted to sponsor?
◧◩
2. Pareto+Qc[view] [source] 2024-04-29 15:55:26
>>jsyang+d9
It's worse because after the first time much of the community was trying to write it off as a simple mistake or miscommunication.

It became evident after the second time though that this was very on purpose and it was known there would be an issue.

◧◩◪
3. jonrin+0D[view] [source] 2024-04-29 17:46:54
>>Pareto+Qc
Well, the activity around changing the status quo was done in a github issue [1]. Which sat around for many months after proposing the Apache Software Foundation's sponsorship policy of "state of nexus". Which didn't give a basis in which to exclude Anduril from sponsoring again.

Obviously there's the "people were angry last time, they will likely be angry this time". But that's projecting personal/political views into a sponsorship.

What should have been the right course of action? I'm not sure. "Tech is easy, people are hard"

1: https://github.com/NixOS/foundation/issues/110

[go to top]