zlacker

[return to "A leadership crisis in the Nix community"]
1. Laaas+19[view] [source] 2024-04-29 15:38:45
>>elikog+(OP)
I think it’s important to make clear that the letter is mostly bogus and almost libelous.

Check into any one claim, and you’ll find it’s not the entire story.

This however is true:

> The Foundation board has unrepresentative composition relative to the community because, due to our count, all current members are cisgender, white-passing, men, one of whom has done military service, and one other (Eelco) likely relies on undisclosed military-tech work.

◧◩
2. Pareto+na[view] [source] 2024-04-29 15:44:45
>>Laaas+19
> I think it’s important to make clear that the letter is mostly bogus and almost libelous.

That's not my reading of it.

However my biggest issue is the conflict of interest between Eelco -> DetSys -> Anduril Contract -> Eelco fighting hard for Nix to sponsor Anduril.

As foundation chair he should declare that he doesn't have a conflict of interest and DetSys doesn't have a contract with Anduril or have recused himself from the sponsorship discussion.

◧◩◪
3. takeda+2u[view] [source] 2024-04-29 17:01:43
>>Pareto+na
The whole idea behind Open Source is that one does not discriminate.

As a Nix user I feel like those people who started this whole drama are actually negative to this project. They are trying to use Nix as a tool for their political goals.

I think the best for Nix would be to just move forward and ignore them.

◧◩◪◨
4. Pareto+Zw[view] [source] 2024-04-29 17:16:57
>>takeda+2u
> As a Nix user I feel like those people who started this whole drama are actually negative to this project.

The people who signed Anduril as a sponsor, apologized to the community, and signed Anduril as a sponsor again anyway started this drama and are a negative.

[go to top]