zlacker

>>srid+(OP)
This is exactly what the opponents of CoC-culture warned about: it's a clever rhetorical smokescreen to allow leftist freaks to do power grabs like this. Words like "harm", "inclusive", "community" etc have dual-meanings, one for the clique insiders and another for the outsiders.

And lmao wow, one of the mods involved in this is also a mod at lobste.rs. No wonder the "discussion" there looked so uncanny.

>>_dain_+Oc
wrt. Lobsters, check your facts.

- Moderation actions are public on lobsters: https://lobste.rs/moderations

- Irene wasn’t active in that discussion.

- Some of the most upvoted comments were against the moderation clique.

>>quadho+sj
Irene also wasn't involved in me removing srid's attempted brigading or it being the last straw for his ban.

The author of this article doesn't seem particularly interested in checking facts, they implied some nasty stuff about my actions and motivation without bothering to read the publicly available info or contact me.

>>pushcx+cF
> srid's attempted brigading

Nowhere in the ban log you mentioned "attempted brigading"; rather what you mentioned, as reasons for the ban, was "lots of off-topic stories" & "[using] Lobsters to fight with the NixOS project".

https://twitter.com/sridca/status/1751586246026313906

Neither of which is true, of course, nor can they be proven.

To let the readers judge for themselves, here are my lobste.rs submissions & comments:

https://lobste.rs/~srid/stories

https://lobste.rs/~srid/threads

And here's the submission that got me banned (after a NixOS moderator, Hexa, commented on it so as to derail the submission):

https://archive.is/Z2BU3

https://archive.is/75A7j

>>srid+Kr2
Readers can’t judge for themselves because 23 of your comments and 21 of your stories were removed, mostly for abuse. (For context, less than 0.5% of commenters or submitters ever have a single removal.) You received several warnings about picking fights and you’re understandably focused on your fight with Nix but it only happened to be the last one you tried to start on Lobsters. There’s a pattern in your actions that’s why you keep getting rejected by technical communities, and it’s going to keep happening as long as you imagine a conspiracy or political motivation instead of looking at the pattern and taking responsibility for your behavior.

>>pushcx+xI2
> Readers can’t judge for themselves [..]

Ah, but they can.

> [your fight with Nix] only happened to be the last one you tried to start on Lobsters.

For example, readers can easily verify that this statement is lie by going to that last submission and see that there was no fight (except Hexa himself fighting into the void):

https://archive.is/Z2BU3

https://archive.is/75A7j

So, once again, where is the evidence for your accusations?

(Incidentally, where you say "23 of your comments and 21 of your stories" -- a figure I can't confirm -- I'm sure none of those happened in the last few months or are related to Nix in anyway, as my involvement have exclusively been technical, ergo they are nothing to do with "[using] Lobsters to fight with the NixOS project", and if they were about "lots of off-topic stories" then I would have been banned long time ago.)