zlacker

[return to "Google ordered to identify who watched certain YouTube videos"]
1. noneth+M6[view] [source] 2024-03-23 02:39:45
>>wut42+(OP)
Im increasingly coming to the opinion that anonymity isnt guaranteed so you should assume everyone knows what you do.m and who you are. So you should probably just use your real name and do way less online.

Havent fully swallowed this pill but its feeling inevitable.

◧◩
2. cbolto+GA[view] [source] 2024-03-23 10:27:50
>>noneth+M6
I think that's exactly what Google's ex-CEO said years ago:

> If you have something that you don’t want anyone to know, maybe you shouldn’t be doing it in the first place

which you can read either as a terrible "nothing to hide nothing to fear" comment or as a good warning about the factual state of things.

◧◩◪
3. Kim_Br+uJ[view] [source] 2024-03-23 12:15:55
>>cbolto+GA
So one's privacy posture should be part of the complete security posture, and should ideally start at

"DEFAULT DENY ALL"

After which you can -of course- start opening up ports and start trusting people with information. Even if done imperfectly, one's attack surface is at least under some sort of control. I mean -at least- a semblance of control can be taken, however aspirational in practice. It allows conscious control of ones information flows.

As you may have experienced yourself a posture of "DEFAULT ALLOW ALL" is effectively impossible to manage, since tracking down and plugging new leaks faster than they show up is pretty much like bailing out a boat with -well- a squillion leaks (and more every minute).

Getting muggles to a safe default posture is going to be difficult. However, seeing the growing awareness in society it might not be impossible.

Think of nascent privacy initiatives by the EU (no matter how (in)effective as yet). Or you could think of starting school programs akin to "just say no" for instance, promoting more conscious and careful online behavior. It might never be perfect, but some level of herd resilience might be attainable?

[go to top]