zlacker

[return to "Google ordered to identify who watched certain YouTube videos"]
1. mschus+k3[view] [source] 2024-03-23 01:52:14
>>wut42+(OP)
> “This is the latest chapter in a disturbing trend where we see government agencies increasingly transforming search warrants into digital dragnets. It’s unconstitutional, it’s terrifying and it’s happening every day,” said Albert Fox-Cahn, executive director at the Surveillance Technology Oversight Project.

If companies would respect the spirit behind GDPR and not store data that is not needed to fulfill a user's requests and protect the data that they must have in a way that makes dragnet searches impossible, this would not be a problem.

Instead, we have sites not being ashamed in informing you about literally thousands of external ad broker, tracking, notifications and whatnotelse integrations.

To u/decremental: you seem to be shadowbanned, here's an Archive link: https://archive.ph/kAXQ1

◧◩
2. loeg+k5[view] [source] 2024-03-23 02:15:38
>>mschus+k3
> If companies would respect the spirit behind GDPR and not store data that is not needed to fulfill a user's requests and protect the data that they must have in a way that makes dragnet searches impossible, this would not be a problem.

Saving user watch history is useful for users. Sure, make it optional, but I find it really useful that youtube shows me if I've already watched a video, and that I can find recently seen videos in my watch history.

◧◩◪
3. noneth+u6[view] [source] 2024-03-23 02:35:07
>>loeg+k5
That doesn’t require them to know who you are.
[go to top]