zlacker

>>modele+(OP)
If OpenAI became a non-profit with this in its charter:

“resulting technology will benefit the public and the corporation will seek to open source technology for the public benefit when applicable. The corporation is not organized for the private gain of any person"

I don't think it is going to be hard to show that they are doing something very different than what they said they were going to do.

>>troupe+Kd1
Is the charter legally binding?

Is it unchangeable?

A single quote doesn't tell us much.

>>99_00+Sq1
Going to the IRS and saying, "This is how we plan to benefit humanity and because of that, we shouldn't have to pay income tax." and then coming back later and saying, "We decided to do the opposite of what we said." is likely to create some problems.

>>troupe+iC1
Right, and when they decide to do the opposite they lose the tax benefit, I'm not really sure there's an argument that says they can't change their designation.

>>Spivak+XH1
It matters though because they didn't change their designation before acting differently, which would make them liable. Not sure to whom they'd be liable though, other than the IRS.

>>foolsw+dJ1
OpenAI LP is the designation.