zlacker

>>modele+(OP)
imo the most interesting page is page 40 if you don't feel like reading the whole thing.

[1]>>39562778

>>neom+2Q
"I think for a governance structure, we should start with 5 people and I'd propose you, [REDACTED], [REDACTED], [REDACTED], and me. Technology would be owned by the foundation and used "for the good of the world", and in cases where it's not obvious how that should be applied the 5 of us would decide."

You can find the number of letters of the redacted text and then guess who they are. It's fun!

>>Jun8+y01
> "for the good of the world", and in cases where it's not obvious how that should be applied the 5 of us would decide."

It's hard not to be a bit cynical about such an arrangement.

>>emoden+b41
Do you have a better suggestion? At the end of the day, someone has to make decisions. Who wouldn't nominate themselves?

>>justre+Fs1
A board subject to some form of democratic control, for instance, might be better than a council of five self-appointed dictators for life, if the goal is really the benefit of the whole of humanity.