zlacker

>>modele+(OP)
Wouldn't you have to prove damages in a lawsuit like this? What damages does Musk personally suffer if OpenAI has in fact broken their contract?

>>BitWis+3T
A non-profit took his money and decided to be for profit and compete with the AI efforts of his own companies?

>>Kepler+yW
You would have an argument if Elon Musk didn't attempted to take over OpenAI, and proceeded to abandon it after his attempts were rejected and he complained the organization was going nowhere.

https://www.theverge.com/2023/3/24/23654701/openai-elon-musk...

I don't think Elon Musk has a case or holds the moral high ground. It sounds like he's just pissed he committed a colossal error of analysis and is now trying to rewrite history to hide his screwups.

>>foofie+241
That sounds like the petty, vindictive, childish type of stunt we've all grown to expect from him. That's what's making this so hard to parse out, 2 rich assholes with a history of lying are lobbing accusations at each other. They're both wrong, and maybe both right? But it's so messy because one is a colossal douche and the other is less of a douche.

>>quicks+H61
Thing to keep in mind. That Musk even might force to open up GPT4.

That would be nice outcome, regardless of original intention. (Revenge or charity)

Edit: after a but of thinking, more realistically, threat to open sourcing gpt4 is a leverage, that musk will use for other purposes (e.g. Shares in for profit part)