zlacker

>>modele+(OP)
Wouldn't you have to prove damages in a lawsuit like this? What damages does Musk personally suffer if OpenAI has in fact broken their contract?

>>BitWis+3T
A non-profit took his money and decided to be for profit and compete with the AI efforts of his own companies?

>>Kepler+yW
Yeah, OpenAI basically grafted a for-profit entity onto the non-profit to bypass their entire mission. They’re now extremely closed AI, and are valued at $80+ billion.

If I donated millions to them, I’d be furious.

>>a_wild+3Z
It's almost like the guy behind an obvious grift like Worldcoin doesn't always work in good faith.

What gives me even less sympathy for Altman is that he took OpenAI, whose mission was open AI, and turned it not only closed but then immediately started a world tour trying to weaponize fear-mongering to convince governments to effectively outlaw actually open AI.

>>api+901
I have no specific sympathy for Altman one way or the other, but:

Why is Worldcoin a grift?

And I believe his argument for it not being open is safety.

>>mherrm+F01
“Now that I have a powerful weapon, it’s very important for safety that people who aren’t me don’t have one”

>>Spooky+C11
As much as it's appealing to point out hypocrisy, and as little sympathy for Altman, I honestly think that's a very reasonable stance to take. There're many powers with which, given the opportunity, I would choose to trust only exactly myself.

>>BobaFl+d41
It’s reasonable for the holder to take. It’s also reasonable for all of the non-holders to immediately destroy the holder.

It was “reasonable” for the US to first strike the Soviet Union in the 40s before they got nuclear capabilities. But it wasn’t right and I’m glad the US didn’t do that.