zlacker

[return to ""]
1. achow+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-03-01 08:11:07
>>modele+z4
> Microsoft gained exclusive licensing to OpenAI's GPT-3 language model in 2020. Microsoft continues to assert rights to GPT-4, which it claims has not reached the level of AGI, which would block its licensing privileges.

Not sure this is a common knowledge - MSFT licence vis-a-vis AGI.

2. modele+z4[view] [source] 2024-03-01 08:56:05
3. rickde+06[view] [source] 2024-03-01 09:11:44
>>achow+(OP)
It's described here: https://openai.com/our-structure

Quote:

  Fifth, the board determines when we've attained AGI. Again, by AGI we mean a highly autonomous system that outperforms humans at most economically valuable work. Such a system is excluded from IP licenses and other commercial terms with Microsoft, which only apply to pre-AGI technology.

> "Musk claims Microsoft's hold on Altman and the OpenAI board will keep them from declaring GPT-4 as a AGI in order to keep the technology private and profitable."

Well.....sounds plausible...

◧◩
4. ks2048+pW[view] [source] 2024-03-01 16:24:59
>>rickde+06
I'm surprised such an important legal issue here is based on the definition of "AGI", seems really hard to define (I really think the concept is flawed). Does this consider that "most economically valuable work" is physical? And more importantly, with such money on the line, no one will agree on when AGI is attained.
◧◩◪
5. a_wild+ee1[view] [source] 2024-03-01 17:46:31
>>ks2048+pW
Altman himself said it's nebulous and hates the term.
[go to top]