zlacker

>>modele+(OP)
imo the most interesting page is page 40 if you don't feel like reading the whole thing.

[1]>>39562778

>>neom+2Q
"I think for a governance structure, we should start with 5 people and I'd propose you, [REDACTED], [REDACTED], [REDACTED], and me. Technology would be owned by the foundation and used "for the good of the world", and in cases where it's not obvious how that should be applied the 5 of us would decide."

You can find the number of letters of the redacted text and then guess who they are. It's fun!

>>Jun8+y01
> "for the good of the world", and in cases where it's not obvious how that should be applied the 5 of us would decide."

It's hard not to be a bit cynical about such an arrangement.

>>emoden+b41
It's a very pre-2016 view of the tech industry, for sure.

Back when the public at least somewhat bought the idea that SV was socially progressive and would use its massive accumulation of capital for the good of humanity.