zlacker

>>modele+(OP)
AI is going to continue to have incremental progress, particularly now in hardware gains. No one can even define what AGI is or what it will look like, let alone be something that OpenAI would own? Features progress is too incremental to suddenly pop out with "AGI". Fighting about it seems a distraction.

>>okhuma+3k
There's also no reason to believe that incremental progress in transformer models will eventually lead to "AGI".

>>root_a+kO
Yes, but I think everyone would agree that the chance isn't 0%

>>snapca+qQ
It's a static single-pass feed-forward network. How could that possibly result in AGI?! (Queue famous last words ...)

>>pton_x+5T
IMO it could become an AGI IFF it has an infinitely long context window. Otherwise I see absolutely no chance of it becoming a true agi