zlacker

>>miohta+(OP)
Who is the victim of this “crime” here?

>>iammjm+x3
This is probably controversial, but if we assume that pedos will (unfortunately) exist and will generate demand for this kind of material, isn't it better if it comes from an AI instead of real children?

>>Ahoy87+p5
For it to come from AI it needs to come from real children. Chicken and the egg scenario.

Someone abuses a child, film it, put it in AI. And they now have that child's model.

Throw away the child and they're currently guilty free if any charges. Of course that won't be enough so repeat the process.

It's not like someone is creating a model in blender and than running that though a AI. Not like that doesn't happen anyway.

>>double+k7
Gen AI does not need to be training on photos of nude children to produce photos of nude children. It can generate a flying pig soaring over Congress without ever being trained to do so.

>>nickth+Q8
It may not but why would it not be trained on child imagery if not to produce photorealistic results?

If you had the opportunity to tune your AI with photography than to self generated where true photography of a pig which produced higher quality less defects on generation why would you not go for such?