zlacker

>>miohta+(OP)
Who is the victim of this “crime” here?

>>iammjm+x3
One thing that comes to mind is this: imagine someone is found with cp on a device. They could defend themselves saying it is AI generated. Unless there is a reliable way to tell AI fakes from real ones people could possibly use this defense.

>>DalasN+57
If AI generated porn were indistinguishable wouldn't that almost totally eliminate demand for the real stuff?

>>ng12+r7
Unknown. For example, I have heard most offenders abuse their relatives, and I don't expect synthetic material to have any impact in this category.

Also, the only way to find out if this has any effect at all (positive or negative) would disgust and outrage many, as that test would require having a region where it's forbidden and a control group where it's allowed and seeing which is worse.

I'm not sure how many people would try to lynch mob (let alone vote out) whoever tries to do that, but I'm sure it's enough that exact numbers don't matter.

>>ben_w+V8
My guess is that offenders abuse relatives because they are easier to access and manipulate, not because there is a true preference there. More a crime of opportunity than a pursued goal.