zlacker

>>mfigui+M3
Frankly, OpenAI seems to be losing its luster, and fast.

Plugins were a failure. GPTs are a little better, but I still don't see the product market fit. GPT-4 is still king, but not by that much any more. It's not even clear that they're doing great research, because they don't publish.

GPT-5 has to be incredibly good at this point, and I'm not sure that it will be.

>>skepti+(OP)
> Frankly, OpenAI seems to be losing its luster, and fast.

Good.

I have no idea what's really going on inside that company but the way the staff were acting on twitter when Altman got the push was genuinely scary, major red flags, bad vibes, you name it, it reeked of it.

>>154573+Ue
It lost a little of its cool factor. However, they provide a nearly essential service at this point. While it is easy to underestimate, I suspect this is already have a measurable impact on global GDP.

>>osigur+ol
> I suspect this is already have a measurable impact on global GDP.

Yeah putting people out of work on an industrial scale is probably gonna have a pretty big effect on global GDP

>>154573+kG
Is inefficiency the path to economic greatness and quality of life improvements? I suspect no.

>>osigur+GM2
Probably the answer to that question is yes. Because a large number of people born aren't as intelligent as a really good LLM but unless you're intending to leave them to starve (hi to all the e/acc peeps out there, I hate you!) you need to create a system with inefficiencies so that they don't just litter the street begging and dying.