zlacker

[return to "Memory and new controls for ChatGPT"]
1. bluish+ca[view] [source] 2024-02-13 19:01:46
>>Josely+(OP)
It is already ignoring your prompt and custom instructions. For example, If I explicity ask it to provide a code instead of an overview it will respond by apologizing and then provide the same overview answer with minimal if no code.

Will memory provide a solution to that or will be a different thing to ignore?

◧◩
2. minima+He[view] [source] 2024-02-13 19:23:42
>>bluish+ca
Did you try promising it a $500 tip for behaving correctly? (not a shitpost: I'm working on a more academic analysis of this phenomenon)
◧◩◪
3. anothe+tC[view] [source] 2024-02-13 21:31:01
>>minima+He
I actually benchmarked this somewhat rigorously. These sort of emotional appeals actually seem to harm coding performance.

https://aider.chat/docs/unified-diffs.html

◧◩◪◨
4. mnchar+gk4[view] [source] 2024-02-15 00:05:13
>>anothe+tC
Fwiw, I've seen mixtral code degrade when something I said made code safety seem a priority, and it therefore struggled to inline algorithm to avoid library use - at least according to its design motivation description.
[go to top]