zlacker

>>mfigui+M3
Frankly, OpenAI seems to be losing its luster, and fast.

Plugins were a failure. GPTs are a little better, but I still don't see the product market fit. GPT-4 is still king, but not by that much any more. It's not even clear that they're doing great research, because they don't publish.

GPT-5 has to be incredibly good at this point, and I'm not sure that it will be.

>>skepti+(OP)
Running Ollama with a 80gb mistral model works as well if not better than ChatGPT 3.5. This is a good thing for the world IMO as the magic is no longer held just OpenAI. The speed at which competitors have caught up in even the last 3 months is astounding.

>>roody1+Sf
But no one cares about 3.5. It’s an order of magnitude worse than 4. An order of magnitude is a lot harder to catch up with.

>>huyter+5h
Yeah but for how long… at this rate I would expect some of the freely distributed models to hit gpt4 levels in as little as 3-6 months.

>>roody1+ih
I've heard claims like that 6 months ago.

But so far nobody is even in the same ballpark. And not just freely distributed models, but proprietary ones backed by big money, as well.

It really makes one wonder what kind of secret sauce OpenAI has. Surely it can't just be all that compute that Microsoft bought them, since Google could easily match that, and yet...

>>int_19+0p
> But so far nobody is even in the same ballpark.

Miqu is pretty good. Sure, it's a leak...but there's nothing special there. It's just a 70b llama2 finetune.

>>qetern+0c1
By the standards of other llama2 finetunes, sure. Compared to GPT-4, I stand by my previous assertion.