zlacker

[return to ""]
1. skepti+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-02-14 02:35:28
>>mfigui+M3
Frankly, OpenAI seems to be losing its luster, and fast.

Plugins were a failure. GPTs are a little better, but I still don't see the product market fit. GPT-4 is still king, but not by that much any more. It's not even clear that they're doing great research, because they don't publish.

GPT-5 has to be incredibly good at this point, and I'm not sure that it will be.

2. mfigui+M3[view] [source] 2024-02-14 03:08:18
3. 154573+Ue[view] [source] 2024-02-14 04:50:11
>>skepti+(OP)
> Frankly, OpenAI seems to be losing its luster, and fast.

Good.

I have no idea what's really going on inside that company but the way the staff were acting on twitter when Altman got the push was genuinely scary, major red flags, bad vibes, you name it, it reeked of it.

◧◩
4. rendal+ij[view] [source] 2024-02-14 05:41:32
>>154573+Ue
What do you mean? How were they acting?

I was surprised and touched by their loyalty, but maybe I missed something you noticed.

◧◩◪
5. Sharli+961[view] [source] 2024-02-14 14:10:16
>>rendal+ij
It's not clear to me how many of the undersigned did so under some degree of duress. Apparently there was a lot of pressure from the senior employees (those who had the most $$$ to lose) to sign.
◧◩◪◨
6. earthn+Hh1[view] [source] 2024-02-14 15:10:52
>>Sharli+961
Well, to be fair, the board just tried to evaporate a lot of $$$ from most employees.

Any unionising effort consists of employees convincing other employees to join them. Some people will care more about the union's goals than others, and you can be certain that those who care more will pester those that care less to join their cause.

What happened at OpenAI was not a union effort, but I believe the comparison is excellent to understand normal dynamics of employee-based efforts.

[go to top]