zlacker

[return to ""]
1. skepti+(OP)[view] [source] 2024-02-14 02:35:28
>>mfigui+M3
Frankly, OpenAI seems to be losing its luster, and fast.

Plugins were a failure. GPTs are a little better, but I still don't see the product market fit. GPT-4 is still king, but not by that much any more. It's not even clear that they're doing great research, because they don't publish.

GPT-5 has to be incredibly good at this point, and I'm not sure that it will be.

2. mfigui+M3[view] [source] 2024-02-14 03:08:18
3. al_bor+Po[view] [source] 2024-02-14 06:56:06
>>skepti+(OP)
I know things keep moving faster and faster, especially in this space, but GPT-4 is less than a year old. Claiming they are losing their luster, because they aren’t shaking the earth with new models every quarter, seems a little ridiculous.

As the popularity has exploded, and ethical questions have become increasingly relevant, it is probably worth taking some time to nail certain aspects down before releasing everything to the public for the sake of being first.

◧◩
4. bayind+ZK[view] [source] 2024-02-14 11:19:50
>>al_bor+Po
You don't lose your luster only by not innovating.

Altman saga, allowing military use and other small things step by step tarnish your reputation and pushes you to the mediocrity or worse.

Microsoft has many great development stories (read Raymond Chen's blog to be awed), but what they did at the end to other competitors and how they behave removed their luster, permanently for some people.

◧◩◪
5. denver+sS[view] [source] 2024-02-14 12:30:32
>>bayind+ZK
I don’t think a lot of companies care whether they lose their luster to techies since corporations and most individuals will still buy their product. MSFT was $12 in 2000 (when they had their antitrust lawsuit) and is $400 now.
[go to top]