zlacker

[return to "Andrej Karpathy Departs OpenAI"]
1. lopken+A4[view] [source] 2024-02-14 02:17:49
>>sstoja+(OP)
Andrej Karpathy, one of the founding members of OpenAI, has left the company, a spokesperson confirmed.

Karpathy, a prominent artificial intelligence researcher, was developing a product he has described as an AI assistant and worked closely with the company’s research chief, Bob McGrew. While ChatGPT has been a hit with consumers, OpenAI wants to launch software that can automate complex computer-based tasks, like filling out expense reports and entering them in accounting software, The Information reported last week.

Karpathy rejoined OpenAI last year after spending five years at Tesla, where he oversaw development of its Autopilot semi-automated driving software. His departure from OpenAI comes almost exactly one year since he said on X that he was returning to the company.

Karpathy couldn’t immediately be reached for comment. “Andrej is departing to pursue personal projects. We are deeply grateful for his contributions and wish him the best,” OpenAI spokesperson Kayla Wood said in a statement. “His responsibilities have transitioned to a senior researcher who worked closely alongside Andrej.”

Karpathy is the first high-profile departure at OpenAI since several senior staff resigned in the wake of CEO Sam Altman’s ouster by the board of OpenAI’s nonprofit parent. The staffers returned to the company alongside Altman after the board reversed its decision. Despite the drama, OpenAI’s business growth continued.

Karpathy has been a public face of OpenAI through podcasts, and he posts frequently on X. He has described large language models, the conversational AI that powers ChatGPT, as a kind of operating system because of its ability to retrieve files, write code and run programs, and understand audio, images and human commands.

◧◩
2. sashan+R5[view] [source] 2024-02-14 02:29:48
>>lopken+A4
Not sure how I feel about this. I think just telling the gist of the article is fine, it’s like me talking to a friend, but sharing the article word to word seems like stealing.
◧◩◪
3. mholt+57[view] [source] 2024-02-14 02:39:48
>>sashan+R5
It's kind of a protest against the unethical practice that sites like this often do where they let search engines see their entire article for free just to get indexed and ranked highly, only to lock out visitors who click on those links. It's deceptive and manipulative just to get clicks.

gary_0's reply below is a good way to frame the deception: show the search engine one thing, show the user something else.

◧◩◪◨
4. gary_0+j7[view] [source] 2024-02-14 02:42:21
>>mholt+57
Before they switched to pro-evil, Google used to ban you from their index if you did that (show them one thing, and human visitors something else).
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. spoonj+v8[view] [source] 2024-02-14 02:52:35
>>gary_0+j7
Which itself had funny consequences. Expert Sexchange used to show you a page with a payment dialog up top but you could just scroll down to the content.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. jprd+1a[view] [source] 2024-02-14 03:04:47
>>spoonj+v8
I want to believe this is an intentional misspelling.
[go to top]