zlacker

>>Josely+(OP)
It is already ignoring your prompt and custom instructions. For example, If I explicity ask it to provide a code instead of an overview it will respond by apologizing and then provide the same overview answer with minimal if no code.

Will memory provide a solution to that or will be a different thing to ignore?

>>bluish+ca
It used to respect custom instructions soon after GPT4 came out. I have instruction that it should always include [reasoning] part which is meant not to be read by the user. It improved quality of the output and gave some additional interesting information. It never does it know even though I never changed my custom instructions. It even faded away slowly along the updates.

In general I would be much more happy user if it haven't been working so well at one point before they heavily nerfed it. It used to be possible ta have a meaningful conversation on some topic. Now it's just super eloquent GPT2.

>>comboy+XB
Yeah I have a line in my custom prompt telling it to give me citations. When custom prompts first came out, it would always give me information about where to look for more, but eventually it just… didn’t anymore.

I did find recently that it helps if you put this sentence in the “What would you like ChatGPT to know about you” section:

> I require sources and suggestions for further reading on anything that is not code. If I can't validate it myself, I need to know why I can trust the information.

Adding that to the bottom of the “about you” section seems to help more than adding something similar to the “how would you like ChatGPT to respond”.