zlacker

>>eswat+(OP)
HSBC funneled $1B (that we know about) for cartels, it came out as 100% knowingly committed, and no one went to jail. Basically the government asked for their cut. Why wouldn't do they this again and again? They are above the law, they are the law.

>>user39+Mc
"The government asked for their cut" actually means that for laundering that $881 million in cartel money - they were fined $1.9 billion and then had to pay an additional $665 million in other civil penalties.

They wouldn't do it again and again because they don't earn $880 million when accepting $880 million in dirty money - remember that bank deposits are liabilities to the bank - they only earn money from interest on that -- and it cost them billions in fines to do so...

>>mikeyo+hf
That comes out of the company's wallet, but does it come out of a person's? Persons responsible for committing crimes, not customers or other third party members. HSBC has trillions in holding, so those numbers might not be as big as they appear.

>>godels+yk
They literally clawed back bonuses from all of the executives involved in the compliance failures.

>>mikeyo+as
Oh no their bonuses. I’m sure it was tough not being able to spend the summer in Martha’s Vineyard that year.